Lockwood de Forest's Successors
by Ibn Warraq (October 2009)
Sir George Christopher Molesworth Birdwood, K.C.I.E., C.S.I., (1832-1917), the eldest son of General Christopher Birdwood, Indian Army, was born at Belgaum in the Bombay Presidency on the 8th December 1832. We know that his family had long been connected with the Indian Army and public services, and like all Anglo-Indian families of the old school, had a deep love and appreciation of their country, India, either of adoption where they were to pass the greater part of their lives, or, as in the case of Birdwood himself, country of birth. Indeed Birdwood dedicated his book SVA to the four castes of Hinduism and ends his dedication with these words,
Birdwood was worried that commercial pressure would induce Indian artisans to betray their own cultural and artistic traditions and ape Western designs in order to be able to compete on the international market. Birdwood’s championing of Indian crafts gained considerable support from advocates of the arts and crafts movement in Britain, Birdwood was addressed in an open letter dated, significantly, May 1st, 1879 and endorsed by some the most imporant figures in this movement, many of whom have a solid place in the history of art, figures such as William Morris, Edward Burne-Jones, Philip Webb, Walter Crane, Frederic Leighton, and Caspar Purdon Clarke:
“In common with all who have given any attention to the subject, we have seen and lamented the rapid deteroriation that has of late befallen the great historical arts of India.
The independent and courageous criticism contained in your Handbook, founded on close observation and long experience, has shown us the causes that have been at work in bringing about this deterioration, and has given us hope that something may yet be done to stay its further progress”
Birdwood then published The Industrial Arts of India  which is “an amplification of his earlier handbook, carefully re-written, with additional matter from the administrative reports of the local Governments of India, aud provincial gazetteers. Though the second part of the Industrial Arts of India is thus a republication, with large additions, of the author's handbook above mentioned, the first part is entirely devoted to a carefully written, and accurate account of the Hindu Pantheon, without some knowledge of which Dr. Birdwood says, ‘half the interest of the manual arts of India is lost.’ ” As the Calcutta Review further noted, “the handbook is a very full aud systematic account in detail of the manufacturing resources of India.” Birdwood claims that “The arts of India are the illustration of the religious life of the Hindus, as that life was already organized in full perfection ‘under the Code of Manu, B.C., 900—300.’ Although some of ‘the freshness of its Vedic morning has been already lost,' it is left still in its first religious and heroic stage, as we find it painted in the Ramayana and Mahabharata; and we owe its ‘preservation, through the past three thousand years, from change' and decay, chiefly to the Code of Manu. Dr. Birdwood wisely and vigorously points out the dangers to which Indian art is subjected by the introduction, of European ideas and the manufacture of Indian art products, cheap, trashy, and degenerate, to meet the demand for orders, which weigh and measure art by the pound, the cubic contents, and the square yard.”
Birdwood’s The Industrial Arts of India was well-known in Europe and the United States, and subsequently translated into many European languages.
PROPER ATTITUDES TO THE ‘OTHER’?
We are now in a better position to be able to analyze the attitudes of these Indian enthusiasts, though it is by no means easy to arrive at any firm conclusions as to which attitude was “correct.” Birdwood was described by the distinguished Indian art critic, Partha Mitter, as an “upholder of romantic primitivism” who idealized the traditional Indian villages, contrasting them with the havoc created by the Industrial Revolution in the English countryside. Clearly Birdwood approved of the caste system attributing to it the excellence of Indian hand craftsmanship, and seeing it as a sort of guild network, the upsetting of which would lead to social chaos. A Hindu traditionalist would undoubtedly be flattered at Birdwood’s endorsement of his social hierarchies whereas a reformist like B. D. Ambedkar would be shocked at this easy acceptance of, what would be for the reformer, an iniquitous social system responsible of every kind of social injustice. Birdwood accepted India on her own terms, and yet, at the same time, his attitude was forged by developments back home in England of the Industrial Revolution.
Lockwood de Forest’s vision of India was also romantic. Accounts left by Lockwood in a unpublished manuscript provide a “largely sympathetic picture” of India. Bombay “was and now is one of the most fascinating picturesque cities in the world,” enthused Lockwood. He was dazzled by everything he saw, “If any of you have ever plunged into a rapidly flowing river with waves often going over your head, you can, perhaps form some idea of the aesthetic river of the streets of the native city of Bombay. When you were nearly drowned in the human current you crawled out on one of the shutter-like counters of a shop to watch the flow go by. There were so many things of surpassing interest I felt dazed and it took some time to concentrate my mind on any particular thing I saw and wanted to find out all about”.
Lockwood seems to have found even the large cockroaches amusing rather than disgusting. He found little to criticise, instead he wrote, “As the highest enjoyment in things seen, touched, tasted, heard and smelled can only be expressed when they are so acute as to send cold shivers up and down one’s spine, one is in an almost continuous chill in India”. Lockwood seems to have accepted India and her complex culture as it presented itself to his uncritical gaze. But despite his commercial interests in reviving the native arts of India for which he was often accused of exploiting the Indian artisans, Lockwood did provide work for many years to the woodcarvers and metal workers of Ahmedabad. And he did after all manage in rescuing an entire house that was about to be destroyed in Ahmedabad; it is now to be found in the Victoria and Albert Museum, South Kensington, London. His efforts to preserve dying craft traditions were surely sincere, as was his admiration for Indian woodcarving.
It took another Orientalist E. B. Havell [1861-1934] to challenge de Forest’s assumptions. Havell argued that “the true spirit of revival could not be imposed upon India from the outside; true Indian art had to be made by and for the Indian people and had to express Indian life and religion and culture. He also insisted that the industrial arts of India could not be separated from India’s traditions of painting and sculpture and architecture.”
To comment on this article, please click here.
Join leaders of the American Middle Eastern community to endorse
Donald J. Trump
for President of the United States
and spend an evening with his foreign policy advisors featuring
Dr. Walid Phares
and other surprise campaign guests.
Monday October 17th
Omni Shoreham Hotel
2500 Calvert Street Northwest
Washington, DC 20008
cocktails at 6pm - dinner at 7pm
Business casual attire
$150 per person / $1500 per table
Sponsored by the American Mideast Coalition for Trump