Please Help New English Review
For our donors from the UK:
New English Review
New English Review Facebook Group
Follow New English Review On Twitter
Recent Publications by New English Review Authors
The Real Nature of Religion
by Rebecca Bynum
As Far As The Eye Can See
by Moshe Dann
Threats of Pain and Ruin
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Oil Cringe of the West: The Collected Essays and Reviews of J.B. Kelly Vol. 2
edited by S.B. Kelly
The Impact of Islam
by Emmet Scott
Sir Walter Scott's Crusades and Other Fantasies
by Ibn Warraq
Fighting the Retreat from Arabia and the Gulf: The Collected Essays and Reviews of J.B. Kelly. Vol. 1
edited by S.B. Kelly
The Literary Culture of France
by J. E. G. Dixon
Hamlet Made Simple and Other Essays
by David P. Gontar
Farewell Fear
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Eagle and The Bible: Lessons in Liberty from Holy Writ
by Kenneth Hanson
The West Speaks
interviews by Jerry Gordon
Mohammed and Charlemagne Revisited: The History of a Controversy
Emmet Scott
Why the West is Best: A Muslim Apostate's Defense of Liberal Democracy
Ibn Warraq
Anything Goes
by Theodore Dalrymple
Karimi Hotel
De Nidra Poller
The Left is Seldom Right
by Norman Berdichevsky
Allah is Dead: Why Islam is Not a Religion
by Rebecca Bynum
Virgins? What Virgins?: And Other Essays
by Ibn Warraq
An Introduction to Danish Culture
by Norman Berdichevsky
The New Vichy Syndrome:
by Theodore Dalrymple
Jihad and Genocide
by Richard L. Rubenstein
Spanish Vignettes: An Offbeat Look Into Spain's Culture, Society & History
by Norman Berdichevsky
















clear
Thursday, 23 June 2011
Gillette v. U.S. And The Case Of Nasser Abdo
clear

Nasser Abdo is a Muslim who  is serving in the American army. . When his unit received orders to deploy to Afghanisetan, Nasser Abdo  refused to go.

As Patrick Poole writes:

"A shocking decision made by the secretary of the Army last month — in the case of an U.S. Army soldier with the 101st Airborne at Fort Campbell who refused to deploy to Afghanistan claiming that Islamic law prevented him from killing other Muslims — vindicates Fort Hood killer Major Nidal Hasan. He made identical claims and threatened that “adverse events” would occur if military officials didn’t accede to shariah principles.

The subject of the Fort Campbell case is PFC Nasser Abdo, who was granted conscientious objector status last month, only to be brought up on charges last week — two days after being informed of the secretary of the Army’s decision — after child pornography was found on his government-issued computer. The news reports about Abdo’s arrest were the first to mention the Army recognizing him as a conscientious objector. After his arrest, Abdo is now claiming that the child porn charges are the Army’s way of retaliating against him."

In deciding that Nasser Abdo could declare himself to be a conscientious objector selectively -- that is, only refusing to serve when he might have to kill fellow Muslims, the Secretary of the Army has shown either ignorance of, or indifference to, the opinion of the Supreme Court s in Gillette v. United States (1971), in which the Court stated clearly that "the exemption for those who oppose "participation in war in any form" applies to those who oppose participating in all war and not to those who object to participation in a particular war only."

Will this flouting of the Constitution -- that is, of the Supreme Court's determination of what constitutes "conscientious objection" entitled to exemption from service -- stand?

One hopes scholars of the Constitution -- such as Bruce Ackerman, who has already taken the Obama Administration, (not sparing his former colleague Harold Koh), to task for the absurd attempt to evade, by illogical logic-chopping, the requirements of the War Powers Resolution -- will not only take note but make much of, this attempt to ignore the ropinion in Gillette v. U.S.

clear
Posted on 06/23/2011 7:35 AM by Hugh Fitzgerald
Comments
23 Jun 2011
Send an emailRebecca Bynum

The army is between a rock and a hard place. They are forbidden from disqualifying Muslims on the basis of religion, so when a recruit starts making the same points as Nidal Hassan, their only option is to let him go if they want to avoid another massacre. They need to be disqualified (at least for combat and sensitive intelligence roles) to start with, but that will take a lot of political will.





Guns, Germs and Steel in Tanzania
The Thinking Person's Safari
Led by Geoffrey Clarfield
Most Recent Posts at The Iconoclast
Search The Iconoclast
Enter text, Go to search:
clear
The Iconoclast Posts by Author
The Iconoclast Archives
sun mon tue wed thu fri sat
    1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
clear

Subscribe