Please Help New English Review
For our donors from the UK:
New English Review
New English Review Facebook Group
Follow New English Review On Twitter
Recent Publications by New English Review Authors
The Literary Culture of France
by J. E. G. Dixon
Hamlet Made Simple and Other Essays
by David P. Gontar
Farewell Fear
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Eagle and The Bible: Lessons in Liberty from Holy Writ
by Kenneth Hanson
The West Speaks
interviews by Jerry Gordon
Mohammed and Charlemagne Revisited: The History of a Controversy
Emmet Scott
Why the West is Best: A Muslim Apostate's Defense of Liberal Democracy
Ibn Warraq
Anything Goes
by Theodore Dalrymple
Karimi Hotel
De Nidra Poller
The Left is Seldom Right
by Norman Berdichevsky
Allah is Dead: Why Islam is Not a Religion
by Rebecca Bynum
Virgins? What Virgins?: And Other Essays
by Ibn Warraq
An Introduction to Danish Culture
by Norman Berdichevsky
The New Vichy Syndrome:
by Theodore Dalrymple
Jihad and Genocide
by Richard L. Rubenstein
Second Opinion
by Theodore Dalrymple
Not With a Bang But a Whimper: The Politics and Culture of Decline
by Theodore Dalrymple
In Praise of Prejudice: The Necessity of Preconceived Ideas
by Theodore Dalrymple
Defending The West:
by Ibn Warraq
Nations, Language and Citizenship:
by Norman Berdichevsky
Romancing Opiates
by Theodore Dalrymple
Which Koran?
by Ibn Warraq
Our Culture, What's Left of It
by Theodore Dalrymple
What The Koran Really Says
by Ibn Warraq
Life at the Bottom
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Origins of the Koran
by Ibn Warraq
Why I Am Not Muslim
by Ibn Warraq
Spanish Vignettes: An Offbeat Look Into Spain's Culture, Society & History
by Norman Berdichevsky
Leaving Islam
Edited by Ibn Warraq
The Danish-German Border Dispute, 1815-2001: Aspects of Cultural and Demographic Politics
by Norman Berdichevsky
What's Love Got to Do with It?: Emotions and Relationships in Pop Songs
by Thomas J. Scheff





Friday, 10 August 2012
Ain't no grammar like what their used to be Bookmark and Share

The Telegraph's Peter Mullen abandons all hope:

Abandon hope, Michael Gove, of restoring standards of ordinary literary competence in schools: for the shepherds are hirelings. There’s no hope – because a whole generation of teachers know no grammar. Moreover they are proud of not knowing it: for to betray any signs of linguistic competence would be “elitism,” wouldn’t it? And, I imagine, they think “syntax” has something to do with a surcharge on cigarettes.

They say, “I was sat” when they mean “I was sitting.” They say, “I was stood” when they intend – insofar as such thickos are capable of intending anything – “I was standing.”

They say, “I refute it” when they can mean only “I repudiate it”.

They say, “rise to a crescendo”, blissfully ignorant of the plain fact that the crescendo is not the pinnacle of sound but the approach to it.

They say such as, “walking along the river bank, the trees…” No, stupid, the trees were not walking along the riverbank. What you mean is “As I was walking along the riverbank, I noticed that the trees….”

They say “tragedy” when they mean “atrocity.” They say “gender” when they mean “sex”. (Is it possible, by the way, to have “gender” with someone?)

They say, “hearing impaired” when they mean “deaf” – as in “as hearing-impaired as a post.” (Compare “as partially sighted as a bat). They talk of “hate crimes” – as if there were such things as love crimes. They say “icon” when they mean “pornographic image.”

They say “racially aggravated murder” – as if that made the victim feel worse than if he were just being routinely murdered – as in a way that took all account of “diversity,” his “ethnic origin” etc. They say “loses out” when they mean “loses”.

They say “any time soon” for “soon” and “miss out on” for “miss”.

The sheer awfulness of all this is that when one goes to the trouble of pointing out such infelicities and desecrations, the reply comes back, “it’s only words.” And this from the very people whose profession is words.

(Oh dear, I hope I don’t sound too angry: but, if I do, it’s only because I am angry.)

I agree unanimously. It is of tantamount importance that people stop saying I was stood going forward.

Posted on 08/10/2012 9:09 AM by Mary Jackson
Comments
10 Aug 2012
Hugh Fitzgerald

"And, I imagine, they think “syntax” has something to do with a surcharge on cigarettes."

Well, doesn't it? Isn't laying off cigarettes just what the doctor -- Dr. Syntax -- ordered before leaving for his vacation In Search Of The Picturesque? 



10 Aug 2012
Hugh Fitzgerald

The worst of these ignorance-based pleonasms is surely that which reflects a failure to understand  the adverbial -ly: thus we have to endure "on a daily basis" and "on a monthly basis" and "on a yearly basis" when daily, monthly, and yearly would do.



10 Aug 2012
Send an emailMary Jackson

And we have to endure all those things on an hourly, nay, minutely basis.






Most Recent Posts at The Iconoclast
Search The Iconoclast
Enter text, Go to search:
The Iconoclast Posts by Author
The Iconoclast Archives
sun mon tue wed thu fri sat
    1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Subscribe