Just two small errata in Allison Pearson's excellent Telegraph article:
If you chose to look, if you stiffened your nerve, you could see two men being burnt alive this week. The first was in England. He was tethered at the centre of a wigwam of stakes. The night before his execution, James Baynham put his hand in the flame of a candle to see if he could bear it. He could not bear it.
The second man was burnt alive in Syria. His captors all wore masks and struck absurd Action Man poses. In his orange jumpsuit, he wandered bewildered and barefoot among them, tilting his head upwards, as though to sniff the air and see the sky for one last time. Then he was doused in petrol, put in a cage, and had to watch as a fuse of fire accelerated towards him. Flt Lt Moaz al-Kasasbeh faced his fate with great stillness and fortitude. But a burning man does not die quickly. Flesh does not take as paper takes. The figure engulfed in flame was clearly still human, and horribly so.
The first of these burnings alive took place in 1531, and was dramatised last night in BBC Two’s Wolf Hall. The victim was put to death for heresy, for wanting to read the Bible in English.
The second burning alive took place about a month ago and was dramatised by Islamic State, which showcased its barbarous act in a video using state-of-the-art graphics. The juxtaposition of high technology and basest cruelty defied belief. How could a species that advanced still be so terrifyingly backward?
The two executions are separated by 484 years, and the slow, patient development of what we call civilisation. We don’t burn people at the stake in Britain any more. Nor is heresy a sin. Oh, hang on: it is in Tower Hamlets.
Britain’s first elected Muslim mayor, Lutfur Rahman, is on trial this week for “subverting democracy”, running a “den of iniquity” and “systematically stealing votes”. The High Court was told this week that Muslim voters were in tears at the ballot box after being warned that it was “a sin” and “un?Islamic” not to vote for Rahman, who allegedly funneled hundreds of thousands of pounds of public money to his cronies. The children of electoral rivals “received death threats on their mobiles”. Anyone who dared to challenge the mayor’s practices was branded racist or – my favourite – Islamophobic.
Neither the police nor any public body dared challenge this rotten borough. It took four ordinary citizens, including one Muslim restaurateur, Azmal Hussein, to bring a private action. This courageous quartet has lined up 100 witnesses, but many have reported “threats of violence, threats to their families in Bangladesh, pressure from their employers and pressure from the community”. Some are so terrified that a barrister claimed they would not take the witness stand even if ordered by the judge.
Is this really the UK in the 21st century? Or is it a brutish, zealously religious, feudal society (not unlike the Tudor England of Wolf Hall), imported from South Asia and allowed to flourish here unchecked because we haven’t had the guts to stand up for enlightened values?
To understand how this parlous situation came about, look no further than Jenny Watson, the chairman of the Electoral Commission, which has just published a report on vote fraud. The report was quite clear that the biggest risk of electoral fraud is in Pakistani and Bangladeshi communities, because of “kinship networks” – or, if you prefer, enforcers of the Muslim status quo – and low levels of literacy or English. Did Jenny Watson let those shameless fraudsters have it with both barrels? Not exactly. More in sorrow than in anger, she spoke of the strengths of a certain community which, in some circumstances, could, unfortunately, lead to…
When do you reckon liberal apologists like Jenny Watson will stop making excuses for undemocratic, uncivilised and downright illegal behaviour? I prefer the reaction of Azmal Hussein, the Tower Hamlets restaurant owner, who told Channel 4 News with a cheery grin: “Voter fraud is endemic in Bangladeshi and Pakistani communities. Because it is our culture.”
Notice Mr Hussein makes no attempt to pretend that his community’s culture is the same as mainstream British culture, as our flailing political leaders do. It is quite separate and runs according to its own rules and traditions, which we may well find abhorrent.
Take the disgusting scenes exposed this week at a Yorkshire halal slaughterhouse, recorded by Animal Aid. It showed Muslim men punching and taunting animals, waving knives in front of them and hacking at their throats. One joker even painted green spectacles on a sheep and other members of staff laughed as the terrified creature bled to death. Four slaughtermen have had their operating licences suspended and criminal prosecutions may follow. Good, that is exactly as it should be. But it doesn’t begin to address how a country that prides itself on animal welfare became home to butchers who don’t stun animals before slaughtering them.
Talking of lambs to the slaughter, cases of female genital mutilation are being reported at the staggering rate of 500 a month, according to the latest official figures. Results from the first four months in which hospitals have had to report cases of FGM to the health department show a total of 1,946 cases in England alone. And that is only the women and girls who have been seen by a doctor. Just imagine how widespread is this horrific, misogynistic practice.
In our country. Sometimes, it’s hard to get your head round that. One thousand 400 girls sexually abused, pimped and tortured by men of Pakistani heritage in Rotherham. In our country. Two actual Rotherham councillors now accused of taking part in that factory farming of young females. In our country. East London voters told they are heretics, guilty as sin, if they don’t vote for a Muslim mayor. In our country. Politicians, like police, colluding with cocksure rapists to avoid offending cultural sensitivities (or losing votes, according to how cynical you are). In our country.
Yesterday came a damning official report by Louise Casey saying that Labour’s Rotherham borough council was “in complete denial” and had failed to respond properly to last year’s scathing report by Prof Alexis Jay. Men of Pakistani origin had been allowed to abuse white girls in part because of “misplaced political correctness”: council staff were terrified of being labelled racist. Cowards and fools, they “decided such issues should be dealt with by people from the Pakistani community”. Good thinking, chaps!
In Rotherham, Casey also found that police had failed to pursue Pakistani perpetrators for fear of “offending the community”.
What community? Not yours and mine, that’s for sure. So desperate is the situation that Whitehall-appointed commissioners are to move in and take over the council. In Rotherham, we see with terrible clarity how the whole edifice of multiculturalism is as rotten as a Tudor monarch’s mouth.
I have never watched an Islamic State beheading video. Why pollute your mind with such hatred, I figured. But I made myself watch Flt Lt Moaz al-Kasasbeh being burnt alive. Something happens at a cellular level when you witness a fellow human suffer that much.
It has taken us many centuries to leave such savagery behind. Civilisation, however, cannot be taken for granted. It can be threatened by corruption, religious extremism; by cruelty to women and children and animals, and by good men averting their eyes from inconvenient truths.
The barbarities of Islam
ic State are easy to identify; those closer to home less even more so. But identify them, and fight them, we must. Let us pray that Rotherham marks the start of that fight.
Good article. Agree with it. Wouldn't voluntarily watch an execution of any sort, however. What's the point of of letting an event like that affect you "at the cellular level"?. Not that I'm at all sqeamish. Ex-morgue and post-mortem attendant, amongst other jobs of a similar nature.
I am not at all surprised by what was happening inside that halal slaughterhouse in Yorkshire. Because precisely similar conduct, on the part of Muslim slaughterers, toward the beasts they are slaughtering, has been exposed both in the Middle East and in Muslim Indonesia, by intrepid Australian activists who wanted to find out exactly what was happening to the cattle and sheep we were exporting alive to those countries. In exactly the same manner in which they kill animals, Muslims will kill non-Muslims, or other Muslims whom they have decided no longer qualify as Muslims and are therefore beasts to be killed. A quick and "clean" death, as we call it, the kind we try to give to those animals which we kill for food, and which in the not so long ago we did try to give to condemned criminals, is the last thing that any Muslim ritual sacrificer intends for his victim; the more torturous the better (to judge from what we know, for example, from history - impalements, disembowellings of pregnant women, burnings alive) and from cases like that of Ilan Halimi and Kriss Donald, and from the autopsies of Muslim females "honor" murdered within the West (many are subjected - by their own kinsmen and women - to an intensity of sadistic violence that within our own non-Muslim societies is only meted out by psycho serial killers to their randomly selected prey). In Islam the hatred for the victim seems to be so great, the desire to dominate, annihilate and humiliate so intense, that the victim has to be made "deader than dead". These Muslims in that slaughterhouse in Yorkshire are practising upon animals the techniques they would very likely feel entitled to use - quite probably desire to use - upon the hated kuffar around them.
I went and clicked on the link and read the article in situ. And now I am perusing the Comments. There are 3500 so far...and counting. And most are irate and well-informed. I do hope that all those people who basically like what Ms Pearson said, and only wish she had spoken even more plainly, will be contacting her directly- and her editors, the folks in charge at the Daily Telegraph - to *express* their approval. Behaviour that is rewarded will be repeated...