Please Help New English Review
For our donors from the UK:
New English Review
New English Review Facebook Group
Follow New English Review On Twitter
Recent Publications by New English Review Authors
The Literary Culture of France
by J. E. G. Dixon
Hamlet Made Simple and Other Essays
by David P. Gontar
Farewell Fear
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Eagle and The Bible: Lessons in Liberty from Holy Writ
by Kenneth Hanson
The West Speaks
interviews by Jerry Gordon
Mohammed and Charlemagne Revisited: The History of a Controversy
Emmet Scott
Why the West is Best: A Muslim Apostate's Defense of Liberal Democracy
Ibn Warraq
Anything Goes
by Theodore Dalrymple
Karimi Hotel
De Nidra Poller
The Left is Seldom Right
by Norman Berdichevsky
Allah is Dead: Why Islam is Not a Religion
by Rebecca Bynum
Virgins? What Virgins?: And Other Essays
by Ibn Warraq
An Introduction to Danish Culture
by Norman Berdichevsky
The New Vichy Syndrome:
by Theodore Dalrymple
Jihad and Genocide
by Richard L. Rubenstein
Second Opinion
by Theodore Dalrymple
Not With a Bang But a Whimper: The Politics and Culture of Decline
by Theodore Dalrymple
In Praise of Prejudice: The Necessity of Preconceived Ideas
by Theodore Dalrymple
Defending The West:
by Ibn Warraq
Nations, Language and Citizenship:
by Norman Berdichevsky
Romancing Opiates
by Theodore Dalrymple
Which Koran?
by Ibn Warraq
Our Culture, What's Left of It
by Theodore Dalrymple
What The Koran Really Says
by Ibn Warraq
Life at the Bottom
by Theodore Dalrymple
The Origins of the Koran
by Ibn Warraq
Why I Am Not Muslim
by Ibn Warraq
Spanish Vignettes: An Offbeat Look Into Spain's Culture, Society & History
by Norman Berdichevsky
Leaving Islam
Edited by Ibn Warraq
The Danish-German Border Dispute, 1815-2001: Aspects of Cultural and Demographic Politics
by Norman Berdichevsky
What's Love Got to Do with It?: Emotions and Relationships in Pop Songs
by Thomas J. Scheff





Sunday, 11 July 2010

Harry Potter and Sharia Law

Sometimes, only a celebrity angle can get the public to pay attention to what's important. The Harry Potter actress who suddenly became subject to Sharia law may be the source of such a moment when the public pays enough attention to create a sea change in national opinion.

On July 2, CNN reported, "The father and brother of a Harry Potter actress will appear in court later this month in Manchester, England, on charges of threatening to kill the young star." The family is Muslim, and the suspected motives are clear - Afshan Azad, who played Harry's classmate Padma Patil in the popular movies - was dating a Hindu.

Popular publications including Entertainment Weekly, People and US Weekly are all covering this disturbing but not unprecedented case, bringing a horrifying fact of life in Europe and across the world to the attention of people who don't immerse themselves in news and politics.

Though the assault on Miss Azad by her father and brother is in the spotlight, such cases are hardly new. Last year in Ohio, teenager Rifqa Bary ran away, claiming her parents threatened to kill her because she had converted to Christianity. The drama received a blip of press coverage, and she remains a ward of the state. Also last year, in Arizona, a Muslim father murdered his daughter by running over her for being too Western.

One of the most horrific and notorious instance of Islamic "honor killing" in recent memory in the United States occurred in Buffalo, N.Y., in February, 2009. The founder of Bridges TV, a television station whose stated purpose was to show a more tolerant and positive view of Muslims and Islam, beheaded his wife. Muzzammil Hassan murdered her in the facilities of the TV station.

In a 2004 press release, Hassan stated, "Every day on television we are barraged by stories of a Muslim extremist, militant, terrorist, or insurgent, but the stories that are missing are the countless stories of Muslim tolerance, progress, diversity, service and excellence that Bridges TV hopes to tell."

While Miss Azad's case is receiving more attention than most of its predecessors, almost all of the reporting is missing a key component - the Islamic doctrinal basis for these horrific attacks on and murders of females by males within Muslim families for leaving Islam and/or not being "Islamic enough." These attacks are neither accident nor aberration.

According to Islamic doctrine, adherents are in a state of perpetual and universal conflict and war with nonbelievers.

According to "Reliance of the Traveller," the definitive book of Sharia law, leaving Islam (apostasy) requires a death sentence: "When a person who has reached puberty and is sane voluntarily apostasizes from Islam, he deserves to be killed."

Behavior considered "un-Islamic" is also cause for execution, according to Sharia law: "Someone raised among Muslims who denies the obligatoriness of the prayer, zakat, fasting Ramadan, the pilgrimage, or the unlawfulness of wine and adultery, or denies something else upon which there is scholarly consensus and which is known as being of the religion thereby becomes an unbeliever (kafir) and is executed for his unbelief."

Islamic doctrine and law allow murder of family members and non-Muslims (kafirs).

"Reliance of the Traveller" on killing:

"The following are not subject to retaliation: a Muslim for killing a non-Muslim ... a Jewish or Christian subject of the Islamic state for killing an apostate from Islam (because a subject of the state is under its protection, while killing an apostate from Islam is without consequences) ... a father or mother (or their fathers or mothers) for killing their offspring, or offspring's offspring."

The multitudes of Harry Potter fans are likely now to do some reading on the subject of Islam, perhaps researching the doctrine of Islam - Koran, Sira, Hadith or even Sharia law. They will not likely be pleased with what they discover.

Continue reading at the Washington Times.

Posted on 07/11/2010 2:14 PM by DL Adams
Comments
11 Jul 2010
dumbledoresarmy

One hopes that the more astute Harry Potter fans, googling around, will - if they stumble across New English Review, or Mr Spencer's Jihad Watch - hang around and read a little, when they discover people discussing the case of Afshan Azad.  

For although I don't think J K Rowling had Islam in mind when she invented the evil Voldemort and his  purity-obsessed supremacist power-worshipping Death Eaters, there are some interesting parallels.

A poster at jihadwatch cited Rowling as having said: [re the Voldemort and followers] 'you have the intent to impose a hierarchy, you have bigotry, and this notion of purity...People like to think themselves superior and that if they can pride themselves on nothing else they can pride themselves on perceived purity. So yeah that follows a parallel [to Nazism]".  

Given that, it is perfectly legitimate to point out that if Voldemort and his followers resemble Nazis, they *also* resemble Islam, for the same paradigm is present in Islam as was present in Nazism (whose inventor, Hitler, greatly admired Islam, and many of whose followers, after their defeat in WWII, scurried off to the lands of Islam, where quite a few of them converted to Islam - most notably the rabid antisemite Johann Von Leers, one of Goebbels' pets).

Here is a slightly modified version of some advice I gave to a fellow poster at the jihadwatch forum, who had identified as one who also posts at Harry Potter fan sites, re. educating Harry Potter fans.

"Re waking up HP fans who haven't yet realized that the Mohammedans today are the closest thing in real life to the 'Death Eater' Dark Wizards.

"You might point out the parallel between the 'creed of Lord Voldemort' (spoken by Quirrell himself in the first book, but by V. himself in the first film, when he is revealed from under the **turban** on Quirrell's head) - 'there is neither good nor evil, there is only Power, and those too weak to seek it' - and the adoration of Power and Violence, the contempt for the gentler virtues, that pervades sharia and Islam and is clearly evident in the behaviour of many in the Muslim world.  Islam is referred to as 'din -e-ghalib', 'the religion of dominance', and devout Muslim Hassan al Banna, founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, stated that "Islam is to dominate, and not be dominated".  Muslims, like Voldemort's followers, view themselves as having the right to **rule** all others - absolutely.

'You could also get people to think of the way the final book opens.  The Muggle Studies teacher from Hogwarts, *Charity* Burbage (note well her first name), who we are told did not teach Voldemort's ideas about the inherent superiority of Magicals over Muggles, is accused by Voldemort of 'corrupting' and 'polluting' the minds of wizard children [compare this with the fact that  Islam regards anything non-Muslim as 'corruption' and 'pollution'; the promotion of non-Muslim ideas = 'spreading corruption in the land'], and is 'punished' for this, by being casually murdered by Voldemort in a display of cold cruelty worthy of any Muslim war-lord.  We're told that Voldemort's followers kill Muggle-borns and Muggles **for fun** - because they believe they are superior and therefore entitled to do so. Historically, Muslims have done - and do - the same to non-Muslims.  A canonical Muslim text states - 'killing Infidels is a small matter to us'.

'Just like Voldemort who murders Charity,  Islam rejects the concept of universal charity, love of neighbour.  Surah 48: 29 of the Quran says - "Muhammad is allah's apostle.  Those who follow him are **ruthless** {my emphasis} to the unbelievers but merciful to one another"; and Ibn Ishaq's canonical Life of Mohammed says (p. 231 of the English translation) - "Muslims are one ummah (community) to the exclusion of all men.  Believers are friends of one another to the exclusion of all outsiders". Muslims are supposed to be loyal or charitable only toward other Muslims, and are encouraged - by the doctrine al-walaa wa al-baraa, loyalty and enmity, to feel and express hatred, contempt and aggression toward the non-Muslims who are deemed inferior and called najis, 'dirty', 'impure'.

The Muslim attitude toward non-Muslims , though unlike the Nazi contempt for non-Aryans it is based primarily on ideology not descent (one can, however, note that within Islam Arab Muslims qua Arabs believe that they are 'the best of peoples' and look down on non-Arab Muslims), pretty much parallels the fictional Dark Wizards' contempt for Muggles and Mudbloods.

'Harry Potter fans should reflect on the fact that the way Afshan Azad's father and brothers have reacted to her association with a Hindu is similar to, though even worse than, the way a purity-obsessed Death Eater/ Dark Wizard family would react if their daughter got involved with a Muggle or a Mudblood.

'Under Sharia, Islamic law, Muslim women, members of the pure and superior Muslim group, aren't allowed to marry dirty, impure, inferior non-Muslims. (Though, unlike Rowling's fictional Dark Wizards, Muslims let a *man* of the superior group marry a woman of the 'inferior' group; this is because Islam sees marriage as a power relationship in which the man dominates the woman as a master a slave; thus a Muslim man who marries a non-Muslim woman enacts the Muslim world-view in which pure, superior Muslims dominate the dirty, inferior non-Muslims - whereas if a Muslim woman is married to or taking as lover a non-Muslim,  Muslims see that as a horrible reversal of the order of things, since it is a pure, superior Muslim being dominated/ enslaved by one who is her allah-ordained *inferior*).

'Another parallel between Islam and Voldemort's movement is that, just as anyone who tries to leave Islam is supposed to be killed, anyone who signed up as a Death Eater was killed if he or she tried to leave."

The analogy between the fictional Death Eaters/ Dark Wizards under Voldemort, on the one hand, and the real-life Nazis, and also real-life Islam, on the other, is not exact, in that the real-life Nazis and the fictional Death Eaters determine membership of the 'in' group by genetic descent, which cannot be altered by choice; whereas in Islam membership of the 'in'/ 'pure'/ 'superior' group can be *acquired* by a change of ideological allegiance.  

But allowing for the different way in which membership of the 'in' group is determined, the behaviour and attitude of the 'in' or 'deemed-superior' group toward those they deem inferior - the 'superiors' claiming the right to look down on and KILL out of hand those they deem inferior and impure - is pretty much identical, whether we're talking about  fictional Death Eaters, real-life Nazis, or...real-life Muslims.

 

 

 

 






Most Recent Posts at The Iconoclast
Search The Iconoclast
Enter text, Go to search:
The Iconoclast Posts by Author
The Iconoclast Archives
sun mon tue wed thu fri sat
    1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

Subscribe