16 Mar 2009
A well written article, with no factual inacruracies. That elections in Kashmir were rigged by Indian politicians is not glossed over shows that the author has no affiliations towards India.
His logic about the intolerance of any Muslim regime unassailable.
We hope the apologists for Muslims' behaviour in India realise their folly and reform themselves.
16 Mar 2009
---The main contention of the sub-continent muslim is that since India was under Muslim rule & the British had snatched India from them , then they should have rightly handed over it back to the Muslims, so they still feel that the English betrayed them & it's their right to re-establish muslim rule in India.
In the quran there's this mentioning of :Ghazwatul Hind-
The Prophet of War said, "Two groups of my Ummah Allah has protected from the hellfire: a group that will conquer India and a group that will be with 'Eessa bin Maryam - " (Ahmad, an-Nisa'i, and at-Tabarani.)
---This is their main motivation factor,
27 Oct 2009
i dont think it is telling right history of partition .why muslims demand for other country from congress why .because they was not getting their rights .and you said hindus was killed by muslims but what about the muslims .was muslims not killed by hindus havent you remember that .its not your mistake a muslim is not human for you because you are antiislamic person.well read complete history then write article dont spread false propaganda