Saturday, 30 May 2009
BBC offers apology to Muslim Council of Britain over guest's remarks

Not just an apology but £30,000 of my hard earnt licence money. FromThe Times, because I can't bear  to use the BBC's own report.
The BBC has offered £30,000 and an apology to the Muslim Council of Britain after airing accusations that it encouraged the killing of British troops.
The corporation offered the settlement after a Question Time panellist accused the council of failing to condemn attacks on British soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan. Charles Moore, a former editor of The Daily Telegraph, made the comments on the programme in March during a debate about Islamic protests at a soldiers’ homecoming parade in Luton. He claimed that the council thought it was a “good thing, even an Islamic thing” to kill troops.
The council, an umbrella organisation representing about 500 Islamic bodies in Britain, said that his claims were a “total lie” and threatened the BBC with legal action.
The council’s lawyers are now considering the BBC’s offer.
It is believed that Mr Moore was not consulted over the BBC’s decision to settle.
A BBC spokesman said: "Question Time is a programme that includes input from a wide range of contributors. On occasion this means that those who are not present don’t get a chance to put their case. This was one of those occasions.”
Question Time is filmed one hour before it is broadcast for legal advisers to check its content. No concerns were expressed at the time over Mr Moore’s remarks, which were seen as provocative but not defamatory.
This raises all sorts of free speech issues, or at least free speech for those appearing on the BBC, to be able to air an honest opinion in an open debate. 

Posted on 05/30/2009 1:26 AM by Esmerelda Weatherwax
Comments
31 May 2009
Send an emailShenonymous

 Seems like free speech is not sacred in England but will let the Islamic world bully its exercise just as the UN has recently done.  This comes on the heels of Britain refusing entrance by the American racist radio show host Michael Savage which was thoroughly vetted in a webpolitical magazine Truthdig recently.  Dissent is a right which must be protected for all humans.  Whittling away at this right will in time I predict carve away all free speech rights!  This is not just a problem in England, but in the USA as well.  It is one that must be championed vigorously.  When does free speech cross a line, only when it incites and promotes sedition and violence, then it no longer can be considered an exercise of free speech but is legitimately considered a crime!