Academic Feminists Ponder “Whiteness and Palestine.”

By Phyllis Chesler

Women’s Studies today–what can I say except: What I’m about to write belongs in the category of “You Can’t Make This Stuff Up.”

A Women’s Studies list, (no, I’m not a member but I still have a handful of colleagues), has just shared a request for proposals for a volume titled “Whiteness and Palestine.” An Associate Professor of Women, Gender, and Sexuality Studies, Janet Gray, teaches at the College of New Jersey and lectures and writes about race, ethnicity, intersectionality–and now “Palestine.” Gray obtained her Ph.D from Princeton and wants to “center Palestinians, the Palestine Freedom Movement, and Palestine’s past and present in a critical whiteness study.” Her goal is to “map strategies for building pro-Palestinian rights coalitions.” She calls this an act of “scholarship.” And, alas, so it is.

Her potential chapters do not surprise but they do offend. Here are some:

“White supremacy and the roots of Zionism;” “White supremacy, Zionism, and the first Nakba; “Settler colonialism as a project of whiteness;” “Racial/ethnoracial apartheid in Palestine;” “White supremacy and Zionist state violence against Palestinians;” “Genocide against Palestinians as a white supremacist project;” and  “Whiteness and US collaboration in Israeli state genocide against Palestinians.”

Frankly, I’m amazed that she is not calling for an intersectional analysis of Oppressed, Palestinian Sex Workers who are POC.

Of course, what’s a white girl to do in the academic world? And from her photo, Gray appears to be Caucasian. (Maybe she feels she’s a black transgender Samurai warrior who’s time-traveled to New Jersey. Ya nevah know.) Therefore, in our times, as a white-looking feminist in academe, one must either declare that one is queer, bi, or trans–or if a she remains a she, that, despite such an extraodinary failing, the defective professor is nevertheless an ardent but scholarly advocate of Palestine.

As for Palestine before 10/7: Please note: Not a word about forced veiling, honor killing, polygamy, child marriage, sex slavery, infidel hatred, censorship, the torture/murder of dissidents and gays, terrorism, terror tunnels, Hamas’s propaganda. Palestine after 10/7, there’s no mention of that date, or of Iran’s proxy Hamas’s use of its own civilians as human shields, their sadistic barbarism, etc.

Maybe this is a parody? A bad joke? Or is it merely a ploy for the funding and academic advancement of the truly mediocre?

First published in Phyllis’ Newsletter

Photograph – a not dis-similar dozy bint in London last month.