Alarming scenes inside and outside Parliament last night.
We are not ‘sleepwalking’ into a crisis; as Carl Benjamin, aka Sargon of Akkad tweeted earlier “We didn’t sleepwalk into it. Many people raised the alarm over the preceding decades, and they were shouted down as racists and xenophobes, despite the harm it was causing to regular people. Now the problem has reached Westminster, the political class reluctantly recognises it.”
Last night the House of Commons debated, or tried to debate a motion on the matter of a ceasefire in Gaza. Politico puts it better than I could
LONDON — Angry MPs staged a walkout in the House of Commons Wednesday night and vented their fury at Speaker Lindsay Hoyle, as a symbolic vote on a cease-fire between Israel and Hamas descended into chaos.
MPs from the Scottish National Party and a raft of Conservatives walked out of the parliamentary chamber in protest at Hoyle, who they accused of tipping the scales in favor of Labour — a charge denied by Hoyle in an emotional statement.
MPs had been set to vote on a motion from the Scottish National Party calling for an “immediate” cease-fire in Gaza. But Hoyle intervened to allow the opposition Labour Party — which feared a rebellion from its own MPs amid pressure over its response to the conflict — to put forward its own amendment to the motion, which also backed an “immediate humanitarian cease-fire”…
Hoyle’s move had little precedent, and was criticized on the record by the chamber’s most senior official, Clerk Tom Goldsmith. The decision denied the SNP — seeking to exploit Labour divisions on Gaza — a chance to vote on their own motion on an SNP opposition day.
Hoyle’s intervention sparked outrage too from the ruling Conservatives, who had planned to offer their own Gaza motion but withdrew from the process in protest.
That’s the constitutional bit in brief. And yes, we do have a constitution, and it is written down, but not in one single document. I have seen with my own eyes how the spreading of constitutional requirements across laws and statutes, some centuries old, should and did prevent a crafty sweeping away of certain ancient checks and balances. But I digress. This is the Independent on the aspect of last night’s events I find most alarming.
Underlying the parliamentary tug-of-war are rising tensions over the Israel-Hamas war, with hundreds of thousands of people marching through London last Saturday in support of the Palestinian cause and figures showing that the number of antisemitic incidents in the United Kingdom jumped almost 150% last year.
That is spilling over into Parliament, where the Gaza issue has been “weaponized” and some lawmakers believe they have to vote a particular way to ensure their own safety and the safety of their families, Conservative Charles Walker said during Wednesday’s debate.
“This is a far bigger issue than the debate we’re having tonight, because if people are changing their votes in this place, or changing their behaviors in this place, because they are frightened what may happen to them or their families out there, then we have a real problem,” Walker said. “So this point scoring off each other is not going to resolve many issues.”
One frightened MP is Paul Bristow of Peterborough. The Telegraph reported
Paul Bristow, the Conservative MP for Peterborough … pleaded with the Deputy Speaker for him to be allowed somehow to vote for a ceasefire anyway, fearing that he and his family might be attacked by constituents if he hadn’t been seen to do so.
I thought, have they got that right? I checked Hansard the definitive record of everything said verbatim in Parliament.