Berlusconi, the inventor of modern populism and prototype of Trump, has died.

by Guido Mina di Sospiro

Berlusconi died a few days ago in Milan at the age 86. He is already remembered as one of the most controversial figures of the late XX century, as well as of the first quarter of the current one. His personal history is remarkably similar to Trump’s.

Berlusconi’s father was a bank manager who gave part of his severance package to his son for him to start what would become a real estate empire; then Berlusconi went on to build three national TV networks, wrenching away the monopoly from state television RAI. He then bought the now legendary soccer team AC Milan and with it went on to win twenty-nine trophies thus becoming the most successful president of any soccer club in history. He founded a bank and an insurance company that are now all over the country, and bought the Mondadori publishing conglomerate, thus becoming the owner of the most important conglomerate in Italy. He also bought a national newspaper, Il Giornale, and accomplished many more things. His divertissements with very young women are legendary and hard to believe, though more than perverted they verged on the pornographic/burlesque. But that happened much later in his life.

In 1992 he saw Italy veer to the Left, and in order to save her (or to save his many companies, his detractors maintain to this day), he founded a new party, Forza Italia, and entered politics with a famous announcement (“Italy is the Country that I love, …”) that decades later would be echoed by Trump’s decision to do as much. Back in 1992, at least half of Italy derided that naïve newcomer, until four months later, the head of a four-month old party, he astoundingly won the general elections. And thus began a ping-pong match between the Right and the Left that has lasted to this day—notably, Berlusconi died a senator, whose party is part of the coalition of the current administration, led by PM Meloni.

Even this brief biographical sketch makes it clear that for Berlusconi to become what he became he stepped on a lot of toes, sometimes, it would seem, with glee. The expression I normally use is: “he broke the toy.” What toy? Until the late 1970s, Italy was run simultaneously by a Center-Right government, which would change periodically but remain, in effect, the same; the opposition, i.e., the very powerful Communist Party, the largest in the West; the then very influential unions; and the factory workers, with their innumerable strikes. When Fiat, Olivetti, Italcantieri or other large factories needed to lay off workers, half the Country would explode. The companies would explain that without the layoffs they would fail, and then close. So the solution was to lay off the redundant workers, many thousands of them at times, but to give them full pay until they found a new job or they were rehired by the same company (it was called “cassa integrazione”). It worked like a charm: the government was happy because it would stay in power; the Communist Party and the unions were the proud winners, along with the laid off workers; and the companies, were also the winners, as the government would routinely pick up the tab for the very costly “cassa integrazione.” But where did all that money come from? From taxpayers. Then there was the “scala mobile,” and that is, the sliding wage scale which consisted in increasing the wages as the prices rose in order to maintain the purchasing power of the workers in the face of inflation. In Italy it was introduced in 1945, modified several times since and definitely removed only in 1992. That too was courtesy of taxpayers. Between the “scala mobile” and the “cassa integrazione,” the national debt grew and grew, so much so that it is now one of the largest among developed nations. That is what I refer to as “the toy,” as well as several other such contrivances. What Berlusconi did is he brought market laws to Italy, eventually on a national scale. With him, it was demand and supply, no longer convoluted compromises between opposing forces at the expense of taxpayers.

Half the Country loved Berlusconi, the other half hated him. Indeed, there was the Berlusconi Derangement Syndrome. Otherwise perfectly reasonable middle-aged gentlemen and ladies would become incensed at the mere mention of his name. They were usually unable to explain why they were so infuriated, but infuriated they were. Berlusconi exploited the remnants of a fading Communist sentiment to appeal to those who feared or disliked the Left. It was all presented as a clash between Fascists and Communists, though there were neither fascists nor Communists. Indeed, Berlusconi was a moderate businessman from the Center-Right who wanted that Country to thrive as all his companies did. Yet there were many closet Berlusconiani much like today there are many closet Trumpians.

It must be noted in passing that Berlusconi was a much more successful entrepreneur and businessman than Trump, and a visionary, who essentially invented modern populism, and even when it came to soccer (the world’s most popular sport), the early incarnation of AC Milan, the one led by Sacchi, is universally acknowledged as the greatest soccer team of all times. He was far more eloquent than Trump, more educated, had a sense of humor, and lacked Trump’s mean streak. He made fun of his opponents, and memorably so, but did not insult them.

Since the outcome of the general elections was always uncertain in Italy, and indeed Berlusconi managed to win three times, so for three times he was prime minister, the opposition used another weapon: judiciary persecution. Berlusconi, who as an entrepreneur had never had any problem with the law, was tried over thirty times. Among the many accusations that were leveled at him there was his alleged collusion with the Mafia. Does it ring a bell? Russia, Russia, Russia! Mafia, Mafia, Mafia! No judiciary inquest was ever able to prove anything, and he was therefore always acquitted, except for one time, later on in his life, when an accountant of his forgot to pay some minor taxes—Berlusconi was for decades the number 1 taxpayer in the country. He was sentenced to community service, which he did in a nursing home, where he went to tell jokes and bring his simpatia to the point that all the patients and the staff ended up loving him (and when his community service was done, he left a big donation to the nursing home).

Back in 2016, being, unlike most Americans, fully aware of Berlusconi’s precedent, I predicted in an article published on the since defunct Disinformation.com that Trump would win the elections. As during the days of ancient Rome, in which so many different types of government were tried, contemporary Italy is a factory of politics, ahead of other western democracies by decades. My prediction is that somehow Trump will manage to resist also the current judiciary persecution and, if allowed to run, will win the election. There will be much turbulence and division for another decade or so, and then, in all hopefulness, a leader such as Italy’s Giorgia Meloni, who was elected as an exponent of the far-Right but who, to everyone’s surprise, has been governing judiciously and with moderation while not betraying her campaign promises. Time will tell…

image_pdfimage_print

6 Responses

  1. You’re living in denial if you believe Donald Trump is being persecuted. Although legally he is presumed innocent, the evidence against him is quite overwhelming and claims of “persecution” are right-wing nonsense.

    _________________________
    “In the four years since, Fox viewers had become even more accustomed to flattery and less willing to hear news that challenged their expectations. Instead of understanding his narrow win in 2016 as the upset it was, they were told forecasters were going to be wrong again. Me serving up green beans to viewers who had been spoon-fed ice cream sundaes for years came as a terrible shock to their systems.”

  2. How many official investigations were carried out about Trump’s alleged collusion with Russia? Four? Five? None of them could prove anything. That is the parallel I was making about the investigations carried out in Italy about Berlusconi’s alleged collusion wit the Mafia. At least, once even the last investigation could prove nothing, the French newspaper Le Figaro published an editorial in which it apologized to Berlusconi for having called him a Mafioso for years and years when, in fact, he was not. Nothing of the sort has happened to Trump. None the media who called him a Russian agent as he was being investigated ever admitted to have been wrong, not to mention that human lizard, Adam Schiff, who “had conclusive proof” of Trump’s collusion, which of course he could never produce. The judiciary persecution is in full swing right now, once more echoing what happened to Berlusconi back in the Nineties.

    1. First of all if you were paying any attention, the Mueller investigation wasn’t specifically focused on whether Donald Trump had links with Russia, but on whether and how Russia may have interfered in the 2016 election (it did).

      And second of all, the whole reason Donald Trump is in court now is because there WAS an investigation and it DID find evidence that he broke the law. It sounds like you only believe in investigations if they say what you want them to say.

      _________________________
      “In the four years since, Fox viewers had become even more accustomed to flattery and less willing to hear news that challenged their expectations. Instead of understanding his narrow win in 2016 as the upset it was, they were told forecasters were going to be wrong again. Me serving up green beans to viewers who had been spoon-fed ice cream sundaes for years came as a terrible shock to their systems.”

  3. The Mueller special counsel investigation was an investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections, links between Trump associates and Russian officials and spies, and possible obstruction of justice by Trump and his associates. Much to the chagrin of the Dems, it found nothing. The same happened to the other investigations on the same subject. It was a case a judiciary persecution, which is continuing to this day. Berlusconi was trialed 37 times—and always acquitted, except where noted in my article. It is not unusual for a party that does not have a clear majority to employ the judiciary system to get rid of its most dangerous antagonist. We used to think these sort of tactics were employed in Honduras or Sudan, but in fact they have been used in Italy and in the USA. One last thing: renounce your Manichean worldview: there is no such asinine simplicity as black and white, good and bad, heroes and villains.

  4. It’s pretty clear that you know nothing about the Mueller investigation or its findings. You would do well to educate yourself by reading the rest of that Wikipedia page which you copy-and-pasted the first sentence of your comment from, because contrary to your claim it did find plenty of things.

    Third world societies, it’s funny that you should mention that. Your “judicial persecution” claims are laughable. There is overwhelming evidence that The Demagogue broke the law and he will face the legal consequences, which is just what should happen. To your invitation that I do as you do and accept the parts of reality I like and discard those I don’t I say, no thank you.

    _________________________
    “In the four years since, Fox viewers had become even more accustomed to flattery and less willing to hear news that challenged their expectations. Instead of understanding his narrow win in 2016 as the upset it was, they were told forecasters were going to be wrong again. Me serving up green beans to viewers who had been spoon-fed ice cream sundaes for years came as a terrible shock to their systems.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

New English Review Press is a priceless cultural institution.
                              — Bruce Bawer

The perfect gift for the history lover in your life. Order on Amazon US, Amazon UK or wherever books are sold.

Order on Amazon, Amazon UK, or wherever books are sold.

Order on Amazon, Amazon UK or wherever books are sold.

Order on Amazon or Amazon UK or wherever books are sold


Order at Amazon, Amazon UK, or wherever books are sold. 

Order at Amazon US, Amazon UK or wherever books are sold.

Available at Amazon US, Amazon UK or wherever books are sold.

Send this to a friend