by Reg Green
Another summer of productions of Merchant of Venice in parks around the country has done nothing to resolve the disagreement between 1) those who admire Portia’s ingenuity as a lawyer for agreeing that Shylock can cut a pound of flesh from her client’s body in repayment of a debt but only if he doesn’t take a drop of blood too and 2) those who think she is a nutcase who should be disbarred.
Richard Armour, whose commentaries on Shakespeare I’ve been revisiting lately, throws some light on the subject by observing that when Portia refuses to take any payment for her successful ploy, it’s clear she doesn’t know the first thing about lawyers.
- Like
- Digg
- Del
- Tumblr
- VKontakte
- Buffer
- Love This
- Odnoklassniki
- Meneame
- Blogger
- Amazon
- Yahoo Mail
- Gmail
- AOL
- Newsvine
- HackerNews
- Evernote
- MySpace
- Mail.ru
- Viadeo
- Line
- Comments
- Yummly
- SMS
- Viber
- Telegram
- Subscribe
- Skype
- Facebook Messenger
- Kakao
- LiveJournal
- Yammer
- Edgar
- Fintel
- Mix
- Instapaper
- Copy Link
One Response
Well, I guess she might not have been eligible for payment as a non-member of the profession. They took guilds even more seriously then than now. Probably refused to let lay advocates collect fees. Lucky such people were allowed to speak at all, really. I suppose Venice had to allow it for spouses, relatives and so on from the great families.
On her strategy, well, it worked, and in a situation where no other argument likely would have worked.