by Nidra Poller (August 2015)
The principle is similar: faced with an enemy that repeatedly declares its genocidal hatred, acts on it wherever possible, constantly strives to improve its ways and means, you peace process. Why was it successful with Iran and not with the “Palestinians”? Perhaps because the comical P5 + 1 applied the pressure to itself in the case of Iran, leaving no one to resist. The same pressure applied to Israel since 1993 has failed to produce total surrender. Drastic concessions were proposed but the enemy insisted on the right of return of “refugees” down to the third, fourth, and forever generations that would spell the elimination of the Jewish state. There were no significant limits to the concessions made by the P5+1 and no expectation that the deal will yield anything other than itself. The deal is that there’s a deal. more>>>
- Like
- Digg
- Del
- Tumblr
- VKontakte
- Buffer
- Love This
- Odnoklassniki
- Meneame
- Blogger
- Amazon
- Yahoo Mail
- Gmail
- AOL
- Newsvine
- HackerNews
- Evernote
- MySpace
- Mail.ru
- Viadeo
- Line
- Comments
- Yummly
- SMS
- Viber
- Telegram
- Subscribe
- Skype
- Facebook Messenger
- Kakao
- LiveJournal
- Yammer
- Edgar
- Fintel
- Mix
- Instapaper
- Copy Link
2 Responses
This is a great article which exposes a lethal perversion of the “democratic” world powers, and does it with a delightful irony (always better to smile than to cry…).
Naivete and wishful thinking are the midwives of appeasement. Alas, fascists, religious or secular, cannot be appeased. More will never be enough. This paper with Iran is called an “agreement,” vice treaty, because no legislature would ratify such nonsense in a treaty. The real issue here is Kerry/Obama regime – a desperate quest for a foreign policy trophy to put on the legacy shelf. Unfortunately, the price to be paid for such ephemera might be Israel.