By Conrad Black
The controversy over American tariffs has quickly escalated from a corrective action supposedly prompted by complaints about the porosity of both the southern and northern borders of the United States, to a comprehensive attempt to reset America’s commercial relations with the world, to restore the strength of American manufacturing and to discontinue trade and foreign aid practices from the Cold War, which were effectively bribes to persuade a variety of foreign governments to remain in the western, rather than the Soviet, sphere of influence. Following the Second World War, there was a great wave of decolonization, most of it — such as in the old British Raj, which included present-day India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Nepal and Bhutan — voluntarily, but some of it — such as Algeria, Indochina and up to a point, Kenya and Cyprus — violently and painfully. As the Cold War developed, the foreign aid practices of the U.S. and other western countries (including Canada) had a humanitarian component topped up by the political understanding that recipient countries would remain passably co-operative with the West.
Near the end of the Cold War, developing countries launched a deafening chorus demanding “trade, not aid.” In practice, this meant that the advanced countries were expected to open their markets to the dumping of cheap goods that they had formerly made for themselves. Instead of extending foreign aid for a defined project, we would all allow developing countries to sell finished goods into our markets, creating unemployment that advanced countries could deal with through their own methods of job creation.
The United States has such a creative and productive workforce and immense economic scale that it had no real difficulty managing this process through to the great and bloodless strategic victory that it led the West to in the Cold War and for more than 30 years since — a period in which the rationale for accepting such deficits in the balance of trade no longer existed. The United States has been such an enticing place to invest that its trade deficit was returned to it as job-creating investment. There is nothing that is unreasonable in U.S. President Donald Trump’s determination to eliminate this shortfall. We’re living in a multi-polar world, rather than the stark Cold War division into communist and anti-communist blocs, with a few neutrals in the middle. The system started to liberalize with U.S. President Richard Nixon’s triangulation of the superpower relationship with China and his detente with the Soviet Union, including the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks. The U.S. and its allies are no longer concerned with the existence of leftist, or even communist, governments, as in many Latin American and African countries, as long as they do not constitute a strategic threat to the West.
This should just be the start of our retaliation — Trump is starting a game all prosperous countries can play. Let us teach ourselves, the United States and the world a lesson that all will remember.
First published in the National Post
- Like
- Digg
- Del
- Tumblr
- VKontakte
- Buffer
- Love This
- Odnoklassniki
- Meneame
- Blogger
- Amazon
- Yahoo Mail
- Gmail
- AOL
- Newsvine
- HackerNews
- Evernote
- MySpace
- Mail.ru
- Viadeo
- Line
- Comments
- Yummly
- SMS
- Viber
- Telegram
- Subscribe
- Skype
- Facebook Messenger
- Kakao
- LiveJournal
- Yammer
- Edgar
- Fintel
- Mix
- Instapaper
- Copy Link
5 Responses
And while the Americans are talking about redrawing maps (cf Greenland and Panama) we should push hard for the Alaska Panhandle to be incorporated into British Columbia reversing the injustice inflicted on Canada in 1903. Nothing is forever!
We also have to initiate some massive public works programs and improve our transportation systems.
One road across Canada is a bit of a pathetic look on the map
From the Federal level right down to the municipal level we have unimaginative sinecure holders scared to show ANY amount of initiative
Here in Vancouver we should be a city as fabulously wealthy as those in the Malay Peninsula (Bangkok, Kuala Lumpur, Singapore etc.) with all of the trade we process, but we don’t see any of the money because it’s siphoned off through Crown Corporations like Ports Canada and the Airport Authority.
Those two unaccountable organisations don’t pour a dime back in to make our City pulse with energy, and as for the provincial and civic authorities it seems that their sole purpose is to pad the salaries of the incumbent staff on the spillway.
As an example, a middle level, run-of-the-mill manager now pulls down close to $100,000 per year( or more) … for doing what?
The City Manager actually earns more than the president of the United States…
All these figures and hidden structural costs point to a very flaccid administrative substructure and nothing will change until we take the chainsaw to the institutions.
Trump in a way is right we have been living comfortably under that protection and economic power of the US for too long .
We have to become a nation that moves out of Mom and Dad’s house and fend for ourselves.
Job one is get rid of these green obsessed Liberals and put in a powerful group that has the mandate to make the changes that, if we’re honest, we all want and need.
The very last thing we do need is for President Trump to gain any ground with his calling for us to become a state. It’s a ridiculous call and he knows it.
One has the feeling that the author has missed a central point in all of this. Trump’s negative attention on Canada is based almost entirely on the fact that Canada is perhaps the most woke, leftist, Jacobin country on the planet. Since one of the missions of this presidency apparently is the destruction of globalist Jacobinism because it is one of the greatest threats to humanity, Trump’s apparent hostility toward our friends to the North is understandable. Mr Black is usually more insightful and accurate in his analysis-not in this case. Should Canada reject their form of leftist globalist Jacobin insanity the approach from US leadership will likely be profoundly different.
Trump considers our unfair trade deficit equivalent to a 200 billion subsidy and, without our unfavorable (to the US) subsidy, Canada couldn’t continue exist. That’s the crux of it. Conrad Black doesn’t discuss this with accuracy, though he does share the opinion of the MSM.
Nobody knows yet where Trump is getting that number but, if Trump says it, I believe the numbers are there for him to back it up.
Trudeau must have ‘hit on’ Melania, because Trump’s threats against Canada have no Common Sense, no realistic numbers, reneging on our trade deal he negotiated and the most ridiculous comparisons with Mexico, BUT
Trump has given us a great wake up call and an amazing opportunity to live up to our potential and show our true strengths.
As a Canadian, I closely followed and supported Trump’s comeback & re-election. I still agree with most, if not all, of his internal US policies on border, DEI, crime, reduced taxes, etc.
However, Trump’s threats to Canada helped me find the patriotism I thought was lost.