School inspectors to quiz girls in hijabs

From the Sunday Times and the Mail on Sunday

Muslim girls wearing the hijab in primary school will be asked why by inspectors. The reason they give will then be written in schools reports amid fears girls are being forced by their parents. 

The chief inspector of schools, Amanda Spielman, announced the move today. She wants to make sure schools are not breaching equality laws by requiring only girls to wear religious garments. ‘In seeking to address these concerns, inspectors will talk to girls who wear such garments to ascertain why they do so in the school,’ said Spielman. 

Spielman says … that primary school hijabs could be seen to be sexualising children because the headscarf is traditionally worn as a sign of modesty in front of men when Muslim girls reach puberty.

Spielman asked to meet the campaigners after a Sunday Times survey revealed that nearly a fifth (18%) of 800 state primary schools, in 11 regions of England list the hijab as part of their uniform policy, mostly as an optional item.

One of the country’s top state primary schools revealed it had banned the hijab for girls under eight last autumn, despite protests by parents, and intends to ban it for girls under 11 from next September.

Neena Lall, head teacher of St Stephen’s School in Upton Park, east London, where most pupils are of Indian, Pakistani or Bangladeshi heritage, said children aged three to five were turning up at nursery wearing the hijab. “There is no requirement for girls to wear the hijab until puberty. It is not appropriate in a primary school,” she said.

Toby Howarth, the bishop of Bradford, a city where some Church of England primary schools permit the hijab, said: “Banning the hijab would be counter-productive in Bradford. It would be telling parents we know better than them what their children should wear.”

Amina Lone, a former Labour parliamentary candidate and one of the activists who met the chief inspector, said: “Covering of young girls is often the first sign of young people being treated unequally. This often leads to girls being pulled out of swimming lessons, dance classes or other creative lessons.”

Aisha Ali-Khan, a Muslim feminist campaigner and a teacher for 13 years, told MailOnline: ‘The hijab should be banned from primary schools but local authorities are afraid of causing offence to the Muslim community and afraid of being branded as racist. 

‘A headscarf or hijab, is usually worn by girls who have reached puberty, to prevent unwanted sexual advances from men. How can a four or five year old child make an informed choice? It’s not allowed in Islam so why is it being allowed in schools? You should only do something if you want to and understand the concept behind it. But the local authorities are too scared to go back and our government has allowed this to be part of the school policy and that’s wrong. They are allowing decisions to be made by schools and local authorities which is worrying and they are trying to wash their hands of all responsibility.’

Gina Khan, a children’s rights campaigner in Birmingham, added: ‘Schools are allowing it because they are afraid of being called Islamophobic and they have been told that this is a religious garment – but they need to support Muslim girls to have free choices, not to be set apart from other children.’

The Department for Education refused to comment but indicated that it was up to schools to set their own uniform policies.

image_pdfimage_print

3 Responses

  1. Waste of time. If the Muslim families know that the girls will be thus quizzed the girls will be told what to say… whatever their parents think the silly kuffar will believe most readily. Deceit is second nature in the Ummah. The girls – no matter whether 6 or 12 – will say what their parents, grandparents, aunts or uncles tell them to say, and they will do it very convincingly.

  2. Quoth Aisha Ali-Khan -” A headscarf or hijab, is usually worn by girls who have reached puberty, to prevent unwanted sexual advances from men”. Hm. And that means that ANY female who is seen WITHOUT hijab is fair game, does it not? It implies that EVERY unislamically-dressed female is “uncovered meat”, doesn’t it, Ms Ali-Khan? The moment those words about “to prevent unwanted sexual advances from men” left her mouth, the reporter should have said – ‘whoa there, Ms Ali-Khan. WHAT ABOUT non-Muslim females. Are they automatically ‘coded’ as ‘open slather’ for sexual advances, because they don’t wear hijab?” Does Ms Ali-Khan wear hijab herself? And does *she* wear it for that ‘reason’? She should have been asked. And she should also have been asked about the special muslimspeak definition of ‘puberty’, which often has nothing whatsoever to do with physical maturation but, rather, boils down to ‘the girl has reached the age of nine years, which is the age Aisha was when mohammed bedded her’. What age does Ms Ali-Khan regard as an appropriate age for a girl to don hijab and thus be defined as nubile? Nine? Ten? Twelve? Fourteen? She should have been asked.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

New English Review Press is a priceless cultural institution.
                              — Bruce Bawer

The perfect gift for the history lover in your life. Order on Amazon US, Amazon UK or wherever books are sold.

Order on Amazon, Amazon UK, or wherever books are sold.

Order on Amazon, Amazon UK or wherever books are sold.

Order on Amazon or Amazon UK or wherever books are sold


Order at Amazon, Amazon UK, or wherever books are sold. 

Order at Amazon US, Amazon UK or wherever books are sold.

Available at Amazon US, Amazon UK or wherever books are sold.

Send this to a friend